Answers to: Best Linux distribution for a non-technical userhttp://linuxexchange.org/questions/1082/best-linux-distribution-for-a-non-technical-user<p>I'm considering installing Linux on my home PC, which is essentially my wife's PC. She really only uses for Web Browsing, Email (via a Web Interface), for our family photos (Picasa is what she currently uses). If I were to get her on the Linux Bandwagon, what distribution do you recommend? We have Athlon Dual Core machine with 6 gigs of RAM and a 500 MB hard drive.</p> <p>I'm currently leaning towards the following:</p> <ul> <li>Ubuntu 10.04 LTS</li> <li>Fedora 12</li> </ul> <p>I've heard StudioUbuntu is good as well which may be the logical course based on her current use.</p>enSun, 05 Sep 2010 17:43:04 -0400Answer by Jocelynhttp://linuxexchange.org/questions/1082/best-linux-distribution-for-a-non-technical-user/1336<p>I would strongly recommend Linux Mint 9 (standard Gnome edition), however, PCLinuxOS is also a great choice. Both these two distros are ready to go.</p> <p>I advise against Fedora while Mint is really a more ready to go version of Ubuntu with features such as mp3 &amp; flash playback already installed. Mint has all the advantages of Ubuntu being fully compatible but done of the disadvantages - the green (minty) desktop is easily changed if this is not to your liking.</p> <p>PCLinuxOs is particularly nice although I give Mint the edge but I admit this is purely my choice and I am happy to accept those who'd recommend PCLinuxOS over Mint. Try both!</p> <p>Mandriva is recommended by some but I give PCLinuxOs my vote ahead.</p> <p>I am surprised you narrowed down to Fedora - advise avoid.</p>JocelynSun, 05 Sep 2010 17:43:04 -0400http://linuxexchange.org/questions/1082/best-linux-distribution-for-a-non-technical-user/1336Answer by EricTRAhttp://linuxexchange.org/questions/1082/best-linux-distribution-for-a-non-technical-user/1294<p>I'd advice also to go with Mint, Peppermint, SimplyMEPIS. They all perform a great install, are great at hardware detection, easy to use and a very nice UI.</p>EricTRAWed, 25 Aug 2010 09:21:39 -0400http://linuxexchange.org/questions/1082/best-linux-distribution-for-a-non-technical-user/1294Answer by MIH1406http://linuxexchange.org/questions/1082/best-linux-distribution-for-a-non-technical-user/1107<p>Run away and be careful of even looking at RPM-based distros they are not for normal users I tried to use openSUSE it is very difficult compared with Ubuntu and Kubuntu. They are very easy and you get support in less than an hour.</p>MIH1406Mon, 19 Jul 2010 19:26:27 -0400http://linuxexchange.org/questions/1082/best-linux-distribution-for-a-non-technical-user/1107Answer by craigevilhttp://linuxexchange.org/questions/1082/best-linux-distribution-for-a-non-technical-user/1100<p>PCLinuxOS, Mandriva, OpenSuSe, Mint</p> <p>BTW Picasa works in Linux.</p> <p>Picasa does not require wine to be installed, it is built in.</p> <p>You can use the Google repository to install, Chrome,Picasa 3.0 and Google-Desktop. There are two repositories 'stable' and 'testing'. <a href="http://www.google.com/linuxrepositories/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/linuxrepositories/index.html</a></p>craigevilMon, 19 Jul 2010 00:22:35 -0400http://linuxexchange.org/questions/1082/best-linux-distribution-for-a-non-technical-user/1100Answer by Terminally-illhttp://linuxexchange.org/questions/1082/best-linux-distribution-for-a-non-technical-user/1098<p>Hi, Andy, also take a look at the Linux distribution flow chart. :)</p> <p><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/choosing_linux.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/choosing_linux.jpg</a></p> <p>PCLinuxOS and Mandriva are also good choices. </p>Terminally-illSun, 18 Jul 2010 19:41:25 -0400http://linuxexchange.org/questions/1082/best-linux-distribution-for-a-non-technical-user/1098Answer by Gorbayovhttp://linuxexchange.org/questions/1082/best-linux-distribution-for-a-non-technical-user/1094<p>Kubuntu is pretty nice</p>GorbayovSun, 18 Jul 2010 14:41:14 -0400http://linuxexchange.org/questions/1082/best-linux-distribution-for-a-non-technical-user/1094Answer by Bill Drisselhttp://linuxexchange.org/questions/1082/best-linux-distribution-for-a-non-technical-user/1091<p>The North Texas Linux Users Group has an installation project that meets every month. If a LUG near you has something similar, take your computer to them and let them install the Linux they prefer.</p> <p>They'll also update the software of your choice to the latest versions and check the installation.</p> <p>Regards, Bill Drissel</p>Bill DrisselSun, 18 Jul 2010 01:49:40 -0400http://linuxexchange.org/questions/1082/best-linux-distribution-for-a-non-technical-user/1091Answer by fredhttp://linuxexchange.org/questions/1082/best-linux-distribution-for-a-non-technical-user/1089<p>any mainstream version of linux will do. It is just a graphic display, perhaps one needs to get used to.If called to plumb for one then maybe Fedora or suse but then choice is important.</p> <p>fred. </p>fredSat, 17 Jul 2010 12:42:17 -0400http://linuxexchange.org/questions/1082/best-linux-distribution-for-a-non-technical-user/1089Answer by InTelhttp://linuxexchange.org/questions/1082/best-linux-distribution-for-a-non-technical-user/1088<p>One more vote for mint, because I migrated a lot of my friends on it and there aren't any problems. When I used Fedora I had a lot ot problems...</p>InTelSat, 17 Jul 2010 08:38:49 -0400http://linuxexchange.org/questions/1082/best-linux-distribution-for-a-non-technical-user/1088Answer by hilyardhttp://linuxexchange.org/questions/1082/best-linux-distribution-for-a-non-technical-user/1086<p>With your bias towards ubuntu and all that RAM, a desktop environment is of little concern to you, it would seem. As such, I would start with <em>Mint</em> and <em>peppermint</em> then, if one would like to broaden his horizons gradually, go with a Debian-based distro like <em>MEPIS</em>. Next mini-step would warrant delving into binary-only Debian like <em>sidux.</em><br> For Fedora, check out <em>Xange</em>! In any event, welcome and have fun! Go Cubbys!</p>hilyardSat, 17 Jul 2010 03:06:07 -0400http://linuxexchange.org/questions/1082/best-linux-distribution-for-a-non-technical-user/1086Answer by Ronhttp://linuxexchange.org/questions/1082/best-linux-distribution-for-a-non-technical-user/1085<p>I was going to also mention Linux Mint. It really is the best choice for this particular situation. I promise you won't regret it.</p>RonFri, 16 Jul 2010 20:46:18 -0400http://linuxexchange.org/questions/1082/best-linux-distribution-for-a-non-technical-user/1085Answer by Booboo 1http://linuxexchange.org/questions/1082/best-linux-distribution-for-a-non-technical-user/1084<p>Out of those two picked by you, I would recommend Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Fedora gives you a bit of a headache until you make it usable(drivers, codecs, etc) but after that it's quite nice and it works great. Ubuntu is much more stable and faster, and besides that, it is much easier to install drivers(nvidia, wireless) java JRE runtime or SDK adobe flash player and reader.</p>Booboo 1Fri, 16 Jul 2010 20:13:26 -0400http://linuxexchange.org/questions/1082/best-linux-distribution-for-a-non-technical-user/1084Answer by TracerBullethttp://linuxexchange.org/questions/1082/best-linux-distribution-for-a-non-technical-user/1083<p>Personally I would recommend Linux Mint. You literally have to do nothing, just install it and you have everything the basic user would need. No searching around for codecs, flash or any of that stuff. Just a nice stable OS with a good range of basic software.</p> <p>I have read several people comment on the fact a clean install of Mint is like like having an Ubuntu installation you have spent a couple of weeks with.</p> <p>You can find it <a href="http://linuxmint.com/" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>TracerBulletFri, 16 Jul 2010 19:05:47 -0400http://linuxexchange.org/questions/1082/best-linux-distribution-for-a-non-technical-user/1083