Answers to: Under what license are the user contributions?http://linuxexchange.org/questions/3407/under-what-license-are-the-user-contributions<p>Under what license do users make their contributions on LE? </p> <p>On StackExchange they use: </p> <blockquote> <p>user contributions licensed under <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/">cc by-sa 3.0</a> with <a href="http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/06/attribution-required/">attribution required</a></p> </blockquote>enMon, 18 Aug 2014 21:11:04 -0400Comment by jeremy on jeremy's answerhttp://linuxexchange.org/questions/3407/under-what-license-are-the-user-contributions#3412<p>I think the type of site has a large impact on that. We already use CC by-sa at the LQ Wiki (and have for over a decade). There are pros and cons to adding a mandated license in this context.</p>jeremyMon, 18 Aug 2014 21:11:04 -0400http://linuxexchange.org/questions/3407/under-what-license-are-the-user-contributions#3412Comment by landroni on jeremy's answerhttp://linuxexchange.org/questions/3407/under-what-license-are-the-user-contributions#3409<p>I guess it is important to define these legalese. Following into the footsteps of StackExchange or Wikipedia would seem sensible to me..</p>landroniMon, 18 Aug 2014 16:27:02 -0400http://linuxexchange.org/questions/3407/under-what-license-are-the-user-contributions#3409Answer by jeremyhttp://linuxexchange.org/questions/3407/under-what-license-are-the-user-contributions/3408<p>At this time we don't have an explicit license for user contributions. If it's something the community is interested in, we'd be happy to look into it further.</p> <p>--jeremy</p>jeremyMon, 18 Aug 2014 16:22:32 -0400http://linuxexchange.org/questions/3407/under-what-license-are-the-user-contributions/3408