I was curious to know what is the editor of choice for my fellow Linux users. For years it has been a vi vs. emacs debate but it appears there many more. Please reply with your favorite editor. I personally prefer vim.
This question is marked "community wiki".
asked 23 Jun '10, 14:54 Andy |
In the console, I use nano (never liked vi/emacs) - simple, effective and universal. In X, I find KATE's Sessions feature invaluable to have lots of projects open, each with its own set of files. So I can have, say, one session called "Comp" containing my computer-related files, "Web" has my website HTML files, "Scripts" has all my BASH scripts, "Music" containing my musical text files, "Songs" has my songs, "Poems" likewise, "Acc" for my financial accounts, etc. Syntax highlighting and standardised key bindings (even a VI Mode if you prefer) make KATE very easy to use, answered 28 Dec '11, 16:20 spock |
I've settled on emacs. The more you use it, the more you can customize it. I also use it as my email client.
link
This answer is marked "community wiki".
answered 26 Aug '10, 11:00 slothcheetah |
I've found kate to be pretty kewl ;) and bluefish is pretty good too when you need a little hybridization between just a text editor and an IDE. But I still end up using pico or vim more often than not to quickly get into a file and do something quickly and get out. You just can't beat the text based editors when you know exactly what you want, and need to get it done fast.
link
This answer is marked "community wiki".
answered 02 Jul '10, 21:50 tallship |