http://linuxexchange.org/tags/apache/?type=rssquestions tagged <span class="tag">apache</span>enTue, 07 Dec 2010 17:37:03 -0500http://linuxexchange.org/questions/1451/logging-to-filesystem-or-database<p>So I'm looking for best practices on logging. IO, resource consumption, etc.</p> <p>Which is the better way to go from a performance perspective. Log to database, or filesystem.</p> <p>Some of the applications can log straight to the database, apache being one. Some would have to be funneled from the syslog aggregation system to the database. </p> <p>So on the applications that can go directly to the database should I, or should I just keep the standard, and let the aggregate do the work of putting into the database.</p> <p>Thoughts?</p> <p>-Rob</p>rfelsburgTue, 07 Dec 2010 17:37:03 -0500http://linuxexchange.org/questions/1451/logging-to-filesystem-or-databaselogssyslogioperformanceapache