Please note that LinuxExchange will be shutting down on December 31st, 2016. Visit this thread for additional information and to provide feedback.

I am currently using XP Pro with service pack 3 on my PC. Over the years I have tried several versions of Ubuntu and have always had to go back to XP Pro. While XP Pro seems to work fine, I am always drawn to Ubuntu for some reason. Maybe it is because of the features etc...

I would like some advice as to whether I should install Ubuntu 10.04 on my PC. My PC is circa 2002 with 512MB or RAM and an 80GB HD. I don't want to spend any money upgrading this old PC.

asked 03 May '10, 19:37

Randy's gravatar image

Randy
51112
accept rate: 0%

edited 11 May '10, 09:48

guerda's gravatar image

guerda
5533515

1

You have a few options here. There is a version of Linux based on Ubuntu and Debian called Easy Peasy. You could also run any of the following 32 bit systems. Trisquel 3.5, Ubuntu 7.04LTS, Pardus 2009.1, just to name a few. If you go to http://distrowatch.com you can look at various Linux OS's and a few Open Source Software (OSS). The descriptions of each will give you what is required to run a system. 512MB of RAM will run most Linux OSS. I HOPE this HELPS.

(03 May '10, 23:23) ilbts58

I forgot another option is Mint 8. I know it will run on your computer.

(03 May '10, 23:24) ilbts58

You have the same name as my father.

(04 May '10, 03:48) Jub

I just installed Ubuntu 10.04 in VMware Fusion on my Mac. Looks good. Now I have to mke up my mind whether to install it on my PC again. I don't use any specialized software on my PC that is only XP or Windows centrix so I think I should be OK.

(04 May '10, 17:29) Randy

Ubuntu runs with a smaller memory footprint than Windows XP anything. The Linux kernel can run as small as 256kb while the Windows kernel runs no smaller than about 18MB which is 18432kb... Linux runs faster than XP and is also truly multithreaded where XP tends to attach itself to every process in the system causing lockups, freezing, and crashing. I've seen Linux systems up for over a year at a time without any need to be rebooted or shutdown. If you are on Windows it's like you have to pack up and move your office every few days... just brutal..

(05 May '10, 09:06) shreddies

Please accept an answer so the question/answer can be finished. Or provide more details so we can help.

(20 Apr '11, 13:58) rfelsburg ♦
showing 5 of 6 show 1 more comments



123next »

Up until feburary this year [2011], I also was running XP pro sp3 at work. I was running ms-windows ports of what ever I could.

Then starting about 2 years ago, I started using ubuntu in virtual box in XP. I started this as I had just had my machine reinstalled, and wanted to keep it clean and also put on the software that was not available on ms-windows. [I used cygwin-Xfree86 to make it seemless, it is more reliable that virtual box seemless( for me).]

After a short time I noticed that apps in ubuntu/virtual-box, and the apps seemed faster than when run under ms-windows [ or equivelent apps]. I also noticed that if I had had lots of apps running in ubuntu/virtual-box, it would always use less memory that outlook, and often use little cpu compared to other ms-windows apps.

I see you don't have much memory so virtual box may not work properly, I allocated 512M to ubuntu, but if you use an efficent distro [I have used vector in the past, but there are other distros now], and shutdown outlook, it may work.

link

answered 04 May '11, 11:40

daves%20dad's gravatar image

daves dad
1136
accept rate: 0%

When you fdisk windows it is gone. you use windows. why not keep it?

try different linux distros until you like one. maybe ubuntu or not. run linux in virtual machine like virtual box.

you can keep as long as you want or delete that virtual machine anytime you want real easy with a click or two.

you can also share with read/write all you data that already is there.

when ready, if ever, you can start from scratch but this way you can run windows linux and anything else all at same time simultanesouly.

you can also run new windows 7 (all three xp linux windows 7 at the same time) to see if you like that too or you need to use it.

link

answered 24 May '10, 21:30

Anthony%20Stanton's gravatar image

Anthony Stanton
593
accept rate: 0%

I was in the same position a few months ago. Over the years I've kept trying to migrate to Linux, but there was always something that forced me back to Windows.

Since last fall I had been using MS's free Windows 7 Ultimate Edition Evaluation copy that was due to expire at the end of February. Well when it came time, I really didn't want to pay $400 for the license, so I tried Linux again.

And finally, everything just worked. Ubuntu 9.10 installed perfectly, ran stable, never needs restarting, and has everything I need and more. 10.04 is even better. I've been on Ubuntu since February and don't expect to ever go back.

link

answered 15 May '10, 00:50

Kurtosis's gravatar image

Kurtosis
1081310
accept rate: 50%

Here's you're answer, if you ask me. Install a Linux distro, and then download and install the PUEL version of VirtualBox here: http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Linux_Downloads

Next, copy an iso image of your WinXP to your hard drive (You'll thank me for doing it this way later), and set that iso as your CDROM device.

Boot the guest (Your VirtualBox virtual machine that is going to be WindowsXP) and the install will occur normally, although quite a bit more quickly than if you were installing from the real CDROM drive.

Once you get to the first iteration of your mACROsFOT O/S, save a snapshot of that iteration and move on. Saving snapshots of appropriately named images of your OS is both important and convenient, for rollbacks, forking the installations, and disaster recovery.

Naming conventions like "clean install - pre SP3", etc., will help to remind you when you want to run your OS in that version or fork the evolutionary tree with other software, etc...

When you're done running your Windows Guest for the day, don't shut down the machine, but just stop it, and then when you want to run it again later it will boot instantly, with all of the running apps you had running and everything!

Hope that helps!

Kindest regards,

Bradley

.

link

answered 14 May '10, 22:19

tallship's gravatar image

tallship
390111
accept rate: 20%

Lucid may not be the best bet in this case. I would install Ubuntu 8.04.4LTS, run all updates for it (but do not get the distribution upgrade), set it to never upgrade to the next version (LTS or Non-LTS) and run with it as is. 8.04x is supported until April 2011.

link

answered 11 May '10, 15:00

Ron's gravatar image

Ron ♦
9361718
accept rate: 13%

I'd say that you could make a dual-boot, but the size of your hard drive make me advice against that. 80 GB is not much these days, even with only XP Pro installed.

Your hardware seem to be okay for a clean install of Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, but don't expect the graphical effects to blast of at lightning speed, (depends on the size of your graphics card).

If you deactivate Compiz Fusion your experience with Ubuntu, and the GNOME desktop would be great. After all Ubuntu 10.04 LTS is optimized for the very small Net-book computers so your hardware is sufficient to run most programs even better than they would run on Win XP Pro.

If you're fairly new on Linux I'd also advice against installing Debian 5.0 Lenny. Things are a tad to hard for newbies to grasp quickly. Instead I'd suggest you try out: Fedora, based on Red Hat, Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, Simply Mepis (newest version), Easy Peachy and distros like that. Don't jump onto the rocket science just yet. Some distros are unforgiving in case you make an error. If you enter a command, either by mouse or keyboard, things WILL be done with out asking further questions. Can get quite irritating if you delete the wrong file or directory.

link

answered 09 May '10, 23:07

Jimmyfd's gravatar image

Jimmyfd
212
accept rate: 0%

If you really want to try Ubuntu as opposed to any other Linux distribution, I'd suggest you install Wubi. The reason is, you don't need to partition your drive - the whole linux install lives in a file on your Windows partition. It allows you to test drive Ubuntu at faster than VM speed without messing with anything, because Wubi installs and uninstalls just like any other Windows application.

However, you said you're a Windows user. Now, if that means that you're planning on using KDE as your desktop of choice, here's some advice that will save you heaps of time and effort tweaking things to behave right in Ubuntu - use OpenSuse 11.2 instead. Its a KDE desktop and even Firefox has been themed to look like it just fits in. You can access any of the system config options from within KDE. If you're going the GNOME route, Ubuntu is what you want.

link

answered 09 May '10, 21:30

carleeto's gravatar image

carleeto
5738
accept rate: 0%

I installed Ubuntu 10.04 on my PC and it works fine. What can I do to make Ubuntu run faster and more efficiently without resorting to a hardware/ RAM upgrade. I would like to make it as lean and mean as possible. :)

(10 May '10, 09:45) Randy

Thanks Pierre for your excellent answer. You make a lot of sense. I was tring 10.04 on my Mac using Vmware Fusion. Works fine. I had a problem when I pressed comnand - f2 or something close to this. I ended up with a black screen that prompted me to log in. Where was I and how do I get back to my desktop?

link

answered 06 May '10, 09:32

Randy%201's gravatar image

Randy 1
111
accept rate: 0%

login using your username and password, then when the command prompt appears type "startx" that should bring up the gui.

(16 May '10, 14:52) GreggC2006

I think a good way to get a feel of a distro is in a Virtual Machine.

If you like it, either install it or do a dual boot.

You can have Windows under a Virtual Machine in Linux if you need it.

link

answered 05 May '10, 22:20

MTK358's gravatar image

MTK358
211
accept rate: 0%

Sorry for this noise message. It deletes a message accidentally posted twice despite the absence of a delete button.

link

answered 05 May '10, 01:27

Pierre%202's gravatar image

Pierre 2
112
accept rate: 0%

edited 05 May '10, 01:32

Your answer
toggle preview

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "Title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "Title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Tags:

×81
×1

Asked: 03 May '10, 19:37

Seen: 15,367 times

Last updated: 04 May '11, 11:40

powered by OSQA